ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-review]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-review] Re: [icann-board] Re: 2001. 1. 15 Report , Part I


Dear Karl,

I feel so flattered and also aware of the fact that there is a long way to
go
for DNSO review, which is expected to cover "review" itself together with
recommendation for the future step.

I would like to take this opportunity to appreciate your participation in
WG-Review which could make this group more active and productive.
The interaction between Board members and WG-Review members have
made this effort more meaningful.

"Thank you.":-)

Regards,
YJ

> I'd like to add my congratulations as well.  You did a tremendous job -
> indeed a superhuman job.  In a few weeks you handled a group that
> generated nearly 1700 e-mails (so far), had several polls and votes, and
> had strongly held opinions that spread from one end of the spectrum to
> another.  It is impressive how you led the working group from nothing to
> something that now has the beginnings of structured discussions, an
> (electronic) voting process, and a good chance of reaching concrete and
> realistic results.
>
> Please accept my "thank you" for your work.
>
> (But don't take a vacation just yet - the WG still has a lot more work to
> do to coalesce and then solidify its ideas. ;-)
>
> --karl--
>
>
>
>
>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>