ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-org]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-org] wrap up


Milton
I thought the $1,000 had gone - in favour of some wording regarding
"reasonable" or cost recovery.


Grant Forsyth
Manager Industry & Regulatory Affairs
CLEAR Communications Ltd
Cnr Taharoto & Northcote Roads
Private Bag 92143
AUCKLAND
ph +64 9 912 5759
fx + 64 9 912 4077
Mb 021 952 007


-----Original Message-----
From: Marc Schneiders [mailto:marc@schneiders.org]
Sent: Thursday, 29 November, 2001 9:49 a.m.
To: Milton Mueller
Cc: nc-org@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [nc-org] wrap up


On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, at 09:09 [=GMT-0500], Milton Mueller wrote:

> OK, it seems that this idea (of NCDNHC
> serving as part of the review mechanism)
> won't fly. I will abandon it and follow
> the suggested path of having each
> constituency prepare their own comments
> on the applications.
> 
> That seems to be the only feature of the
> final policy that attracted criticism and
> comment. So I will forward version 4.1
> of the policy statement to the Names
> Council and its chair in time for 
> consideration at the December 
> teleconference.

Well, I had some severe problems with the deletion of the
max. application fee of $1,000.00. I still have that
problem. Esp. when there is no serious review of what ICANN staff is
going to make of it all in place.

Marc
 
> Pleasure working with you all!
> I guess we will reconvene briefly
> in early 2002 to review the RFP ICANN 
> staff prepares. Until then,
> 
> --MM
> 
> 
> 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>