ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-org]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[nc-org] wrap up


OK, it seems that this idea (of NCDNHC
serving as part of the review mechanism)
won't fly. I will abandon it and follow
the suggested path of having each
constituency prepare their own comments
on the applications.

That seems to be the only feature of the
final policy that attracted criticism and
comment. So I will forward version 4.1
of the policy statement to the Names
Council and its chair in time for 
consideration at the December 
teleconference.

Pleasure working with you all!
I guess we will reconvene briefly
in early 2002 to review the RFP ICANN 
staff prepares. Until then,

--MM





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>