[nc-org] Re: Final (v. 3.2) ORG Policy Statement

["Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>]

I like this except would prefer to substitute the word 
"marketing" for "domain" in the next to last sentence.

>>> ck@nrm.se 10/02/01 08:20AM >>>
> Cary Karp wrote:
> The notion of permitting third party complaint about the diligence
> with which the SO is upholding its charter is entirely reasonable.
> The purpose of the CEDRP is to provide such a mechanism.
>
> MM ===>
> Another thought on this: it would seem that such complaints
> are not against the domain name registrant, but a registrar
> who violates the marketing policy. Could this be a way to
> square the unrestricted/marketing focus circle?

Suggestion:

"Should not adopt, or be required by ICANN to adopt, dispute
initiation procedures that could result in the cancellation of
domain delegations. If it can be implemented in adherence with this
principle, the newly introduced CEDRP may be adapted to ensure SO
and registrar diligence in the maintenance of domain policy. The
UDRP would apply as per #4 below."

/Cary