[nc-org] Re: Final (v. 3.2) ORG Policy Statement

[Cary Karp <ck@nrm.se>]

> > partnerships with non-profts and community groups for
>
> "... non-profits ..."
>
> MM ===> The two are distinct.

I was correcting a typo.

> comment and see if there is any support for it. I personally
> see a major and direct contradiction between the CEDRP
> and the notion that registration in ORG is unrestricted.

Perhaps we should say so in the Policy Statement.

> > practices supportive of noncommercial participants in ...
>
> ... non-commercial ...
>
> MM ===> Either way is acceptable.

Again, I was simply pointing out that we hyphenate non-commercial
throughout the text, otherwise.

> There's no reason for an application fee to finance the review
> process. The only thing acceptable is a "nuisance" fee to
> prevent hundreds of potentially frivolous or non-serious
> applications.

Perhaps we should point this out explicitly, as well.

/Cary