Re: RE: [nc-org] Final version of ORG policy statement forpublic comment

["Milton Mueller" <mueller@syr.edu>]

Guillermo:

>>> "Guillermo Carey C." <gcarey@carey.cl> 09/28/01 comments regarding  second paragraph of section 1 b). 
Our approach to the unrestricted nature of this name 
space will change if the marketing policy is not effective.

MM ===> The best way to handle this is for your members
and others who share those concerns to make it clear
in the comments that you support contractual 
controls on marketing. We have asked for public comment
only on those areas where there is no general agreement. There seems to be widepread support for
keeping org unrestricted. 

2.- Icann Policies. As indicated before, I still donīt 
see reflected my prior comments about the level of consistency applicable to this name space.

MM ====> I am very surprised by this. I thought I
had removed a large chunk of language that made
you nervous, language that was strongly supported 
by members of my own constituency.  

If consistency means not getting less protection to IP 
rights as those
existing today, specially at the dispute resolution 
level and access to the
WHOIS database, we believe it wil be appropriate. 

MM ====> That's exactly what it means. UDRP applies,
which is noted in two places, and "access to 
registration contact data."