Re: Re: [nc-intake] Proposed NC agenda 24 January 2001

[Michael Chicoine <mchicoine@pol.net>]

I am personally against rehashing what was already said at our last 
teleconference.  I would only like additional time allocated if new 
developments or concerns have been raised and preferably would like 
any such new items to be circulated to us by email beforehand.  I 
believe that there are other issues on our agenda that are equally 
important that deserve our attention. Of course, if we find we have 
extra time, then more time could be added to the discussion.  Philip, 
perhaps the way to deal with this is to put this matter near the end 
fo the agenda so we are certain to get to the other matters before 
the call ends or people have to leave the call if it goes over.



------------------ Reply Separator --------------------
Originally From: "YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
Subject: Re: [nc-intake] Proposed NC agenda 24 January 2001
Date: 01/09/2001 04:00pm


Hello Philip and Elisabeth,

> As usual, the NC intake committee recommends the enclosed agenda to 
you.
> Please let Elisabeth know by 10 January of any changes you would 
like.

> 8. Review Process.
>  - Preliminary report of NC Review Task Force (Theresa Swinehart) - 
30
mins
> -  Working Group - request for extension of deadline, clarification 
of
terms
> of reference (YJ Park - 10 mins)

As usual, it is natural to have working group's report together with
request.:-)
Therefore, can you allocate time to this working group properly?

Thanks,
YJ