Re: [nc-intake] Draft NC agenda 19 october

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

Humm...

I just realized it was 7 days according to your report, Philip.

 

Somehow I have had understanding it's 3 weeks, though.

Three weeks still sounds reasonable for non-native speakers of

English to have enough review period with other reality reason that

people usually make early trips i.e. one week in advance.

 

It happened to many folks in Yokohama and it might happen again

for LA meeting.

 

Maybe counter-reality is people usually don't start until they feel

the deadline is coming, though. However, NC should be more

professional even though this process might be tough to stick to.

 

Therefore, I want to strongly ask IC to consider this seriously

and we can have another amendation.

 

YJ

 

----- Original Message -----

From: YJ Park

To: Philip Sheppard ; DNSO Intake

Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 11:22 PM

Subject: Re: [nc-intake] Draft NC agenda 19 october

Well, we are now in the second stage.:-)

 

According to our discussion, all these reports should be available

in written form three weeks in advance to facilitate the discusison

during the teleconference. As you pointed out we spent too much

time in making a report which can be reduced by the written report.

 

I hope you ask each volunteer to make it.

 

Just in case the volunteers cannot meet the demand as requested,

they have to notify to NC before three weeks and the redelegee or

other volunteer should make it at least before two weeks.

 

This is devised not to delay any NC process in the future.

And, I strongly ask you to put this in our Intake Committee Report, too.

 

YJ

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Philip Sheppard

To: DNSO Intake

Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 9:28 PM

Subject: [nc-intake] Draft NC agenda 19 october

YJ, 

thanks for taking a first shot at the agenda. I propose a slight re-ordering. First are items requiring an NC decision, reports etc come later.

And there are some additions and I have been meaner with the guillotine times.

 

Comments please everyone latest midnight Tuesday 3 October 2000.

Philip.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Draft NC agenda 19 October 2000

 

Meeting length 2 hours (which yields approx 100 min of quorate agenda time)

1. Approval of the agenda (Stubbs) - 2 min

2. Approval of the summary of the meeting 21 September (Stubbs) - 3 min

3. Matters arising (not forming part of this agenda) (Stubbs) - 5 min

4. NC proxy proposal (Kane) REQUIRES NC DECISION - 10 min

5. Preparation for LA physical meeting: administrative (Kane), agenda (NC business plan 2001) (Stubbs/IC) - 15 min

6. NC press release regarding registrations of speculative TLDs(Sheppard/Kane) - 5 min

7. Submission of Meetings Conduct Report from IC (Sheppard) REQUIRES NC DECISION - 15 min

8. Review Committee status report: sent to Constituencies and GA September ??, Deadline replies 12 October ?(Swinehart) - 10 min

9. Proposal for an NC report on TLDs and intellectual property (Cochetti) - 10 min

10. Budget Committee - status report (Cochetti) - 5 min

11. Independent Review Panel nomination committee proposals - status report(Stubbs/Chicoine) - 5 min

12. Update on new TLDs (ICANN staff) - 5 min

Total (85 mins)

13. AOB