Philip,
Sympathizing with you in many senses,
I do want to believe that NC can function as
an efficient communication body within the DNSO.
> Lets give it a try
> if problems arise we can think again and change
it.
Yes, we can have another tuning period for the real final.
Thank you again for your coordination here.
YJ
YJ
thanks your quick response.
Membership of IC committee.
This is already decided - we are the members! That
is: Philip Sheppard,Caroline Chicoine, Paul Kane,Y J Park ,Michael
Schneider.
The Intake Committee already exists.Our first task was to do
this report. We are not a one-time drafting committee, we
are the IC.
Safeguards
I do appreciate your ideas on safeguards but I think we are
solving problems that do not exist. The only reason for the IC to do the NC
agenda is to take the burden of work off the NC Chair and to ensure
that meetings are called regularly and documents sent out in
time.
There is NO reason to be worried that the IC committee will
filter the agenda or the NC Chair may dominate. Are there issues that any of
us wanted on the NC agenda that have been refused and that we still believe
the NC should discuss ? I do not know of any.
We have sketched out a system for setting an agenda and
giving time for consultation. I think we should be flexible though - if there
is a reason to change an agenda then lets do it. Lets avoid too many
rules to decide what we want to talk about - it gets bureaucratic.
Lets give it a try - if problems arise we can think again
and change it.
Philip