DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-deletes] Hopefully the last vote


Is it really necessary to send me 800 KB for a document of 42KB?

As it happens, I abstained from the vote on our original document and
see no reason to change that just because ICANN staffers don't want to
adhere to their own policy, so I vote AGAINST this. 

Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \   *    /        Managing Member, NA-NiC (cc) 
<el@lisse.NA> el108    /       | NA-NiC is the the .NA ccTLD Registry
Private Bag X5501       \     /           NA-NiC, Not Just Like That!
Oshakati, Namibia       ;____/     Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
Please send DNS/NA-NiC related e-mail to dns-admin@na-nic.com.na only

In message <30855B1D-A027-11D7-8676-000393D1327C@registrypro.com>, "Jordyn A. Buchanan" writes:

> As we discussed on our last call, the changes proposed by the 
> implementation committee have been largely incorporated into a final 
> final version of the report, which I post here for your review and a 
> vote.  Hopefully, we can have a final vote by tomorrow, as that will 
> allow the Council to vote on the report and forward it to the board in 
> Montreal. 
> I've included both DOC and PDF forms of the report for your review.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>