DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-deletes] Follow-up on implementation committee

Title: Message
Hi Marilyn (and Grant and Philip):
The Deletes TF needs to have 1 (or possibly 2) more meetings in order to consider and react to the Deletes Implementation group's recommendations.  Bret has been the Business Constituency rep on our task force until now, but has indicated that he's no longer a member of the BC.  As the task force chair, I certainly have no problem with Brent continuing to serve on the task force, but if the BC would like to appoint another rep for the next few days of work (including a call tomorrow morning), you should certainly feel free to do that as well.
-----Original Message-----
From: Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP [mailto:mcade@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 8:55 AM
To: Jane Mutimear; Bret Fausett; Jordyn Buchanan; nc-deletes@dnso.org; Grant Forsyth (E-mail); Philip Sheppard (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [nc-deletes] Follow-up on implementation committee

Thanks for the opportunity to provide input regarding composition of the Committee.  I am sure that the BC would support Bret staying on the committee -- but since he isn't a member of the BC, we leave that decision to the chair.  As far as our finding a new representative, are you seeking a representative from the BC? I've passed along to my fellow elected reps. I am unfortunately completely unavailable to be of assistance, largely due to being out of pocket at the ITU Study Group 3 meeting for a week, and other priorities leading up to that.
best regards, Marylyn
-----Original Message-----
From: Jane Mutimear [mailto:jane.mutimear@twobirds.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 6:13 AM
To: 'Bret Fausett'; Jordyn A. Buchanan; nc-deletes@dnso.org
Cc: Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP
Subject: RE: [nc-deletes] Follow-up on implementation committee


I can make the call.  I would also recommend that Bret stay on the committee due to his involvement and contribution thus far.  The BC can add a new rep if required.


-----Original Message-----
From: Bret Fausett [mailto:fausett@lextext.com]
Sent: 11 June 2003 06:43
To: Jordyn A. Buchanan; nc-deletes@dnso.org
Cc: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Subject: Re: [nc-deletes] Follow-up on implementation committee


I'm no longer a member of the Business Users' Constituency. I'm happy to continuing serving on the committee to see our work through to the end, but in fairness to the BC, they may wish to consider appointing a new member. (Thursday wouldn't work for me anyway.) I've copied Marilyn on this who can instruct you on the BC's new appointment.


Jordyn A. Buchanan wrote:
> Hi all:
> I'd like to schedule a call to follow-up on the implementation
> committee's recommendations.  Can people do Thursday at our usual time
> (9:00 AM Eastern, or 13:00 GMT)?
> Jordyn

The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only.
It contains information which may be confidential and which may also be privileged.
Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. Further, we make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you do need to verify that this email and any attachments are free of viruses as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which might be transferred by way of this e-mail.
Please refer to http://www.twobirds.com/fsma.cfm for our regulatory position under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 of the United Kingdom.
A full list of partners is available on request.
Details of our offices are available from http://www.twobirds.com

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>