Re: Re: [ga] Re: [centr-ga] Re: [nc-deletes] FW: [council] Concerns Regarding Report of DeletesTask Force
- To: Eric Dierker <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: Re: [ga] Re: [centr-ga] Re: [nc-deletes] FW: [council] Concerns Regarding Report of DeletesTask Force
- From: "Dr Eberhard W. Lisse" <email@example.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:24:24 +0100
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, jordyn.buchanan@Registrypro.com, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
- In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 14 Apr 2003 13:50:28 MST." <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-To: el@lisse.NA
- Sender: email@example.com
I am only a simple Obstetrician and Gyaecologist, but it appears to me
that we actually don't know what a domain name is (legally).
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ * / Managing Member, NA-NiC (cc)
<el@lisse.NA> el108 / | NA-NiC is the the .NA ccTLD Registry
Private Bag X5501 \ / NA-NiC, Not Just Like That!
Oshakati, Namibia ;____/ Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
Please send DNS/NA-NiC related e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org only
In message <email@example.com>, Eric Dierker
> What you have written here suggests that the registrar owns a domain name as
> something seperate from an IP address. I find this illusive if not down
> right wrong.
> However in the current state of rules, I cannot show otherwise.
> As a consultant advisor to a contractor registrar I still cannot tell with
> certainty what property rights are owned in a domain name regitration.
> Litigation is like art, it reflects life it does not control it.
> Even outstanding precedence can be altered by developments and new customs
> and dealings in trade and practices. Pondits and talking heads should be
> wise to not set rules in their writings but only reflect rules of order.
> > <John Berryhill wrote>
> > The comments are worth considering for a few days, but certainly would
> > have been more helpful if they were submitted during the comment
> > period.
> > There is one error where the comments are seriously misguided, however,
> > and that relates to expiration of a domain name during litigation.
> > To understand this central flaw in much of the comments, one must
> > remember what a domain name is.
> > A domain name is the incident of a contract between the registrar and
> > the registrant.