Re: Re: [ga] Re: [centr-ga] Re: [nc-deletes] FW: [council] Concerns Regarding Report of DeletesTask Force

["Dr Eberhard W. Lisse" <el@ac.lisse.na>]

I am only a simple Obstetrician and Gyaecologist, but it appears to me
that we actually don't know what a domain name is (legally).

Fascinating...

el
-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \   *    /        Managing Member, NA-NiC (cc) 
<el@lisse.NA> el108    /       | NA-NiC is the the .NA ccTLD Registry
Private Bag X5501       \     /           NA-NiC, Not Just Like That!
Oshakati, Namibia       ;____/     Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
Please send DNS/NA-NiC related e-mail to dns-admin@na-nic.com.na only


In message <1141.66.74.225.23.1050353428.squirrel@www.hi-tek.com>, Eric Dierker
 writes:
> What you have written here suggests that the registrar owns a domain name as 
> something seperate from an IP address.  I find this illusive if not down 
> right wrong.
> However in the current state of rules, I cannot show otherwise.
> As a consultant advisor to a contractor registrar I still cannot tell with 
> certainty what property rights are owned in a domain name regitration.
> Litigation is like art, it reflects life it does not control it.
> Even outstanding precedence can be altered by developments and new customs 
> and dealings in trade and practices.  Pondits and talking heads should be 
> wise to not set rules in their writings but only reflect rules of order.
> e
> 
> > <John Berryhill wrote>
> > The comments are worth considering for a few days, but certainly would
> > have been more helpful if they were submitted during the comment
> > period.
> > 
> > There is one error where the comments are seriously misguided, however,
> > and that relates to expiration of a domain name during litigation.
> > 
> > To understand this central flaw in much of the comments, one must
> > remember what a domain name is.
> > 
> > A domain name is the incident of a contract between the registrar and
> > the registrant.  
>