RE: [nc-budget] Job description v3

["erica.roberts" <erica.roberts@telstra.com>]

If we are appointing a high level peroson to establish the secretariat, one of 
their first jobs will be to prioritise the work.  I do not think we need two 
job descriptions at this stage since we are appointing someone to assist and 
advise us on, amongst other things, how best to optimise our funds.  However I 
would support using a shorter job description to start and providing 
additional material for interested applicants to check out on our web site.

erica

>===== Original Message From "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@netsol.com> =====
>My concern is that we will get proposals for services we cannot afford.  As
>long as we make it clear that the ultimate tasks may be subdivided, some
>contracted for and some not, it would probably be okay.  But having two job
>descriptions would probably work better to accomplish this and would seem to
>deal with your budget concerns as well.
>
>Chuck
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be]
>Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 3:21 AM
>To: DNSO budget
>Subject: Re: [nc-budget] Job description v3
>
>
>Chuck,
>you make a good point in describing the nature of proposals and recognising
>these may be beyond budget. But that is not a reason to change the job
>description if it is valid!
>
>I support your suggestion to use the shorter job description in the initial
>advertising/outreach and then use the detailed one once a short list
>emerges.
>Philip