[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ga] Meeting Schedule of General Assembly in Los Angeles on November 2
I like also the option 2.
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
> I like the option 2 too.
> Jean Michel Bécar
> E.T.S.I. Project Manager
> Tel: +33 (0)4 92 94 43 15
> Fax: +33 (0)4 92 38 52 15
> GSM: +33 (0)6 82 80 19 31
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kilnam Chon [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> > Sent: 29 September 1999 03:01
> > To: email@example.com
> > Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Subject: [ga] Meeting Schedule of General Assembly in Los Angeles on
> > November 2
> > we have a few choices regarding General Assembly schedule on
> > November 2
> > Tuesday in Los Angeles, and i would like to see consensus at
> > General Assembly
> > on the schedule soon. the meeting is only one month away,
> > and people need
> > 4 week advance notice.
> > The choices could include;
> > 1. Full day General Assembly
> > 2. Working Group and Committee meetings in the morning and
> > General Assembly in
> > the afternoon.
> > 3. Half day General Assembly in the afternoon.
> > i would like to recommend the second option, which give time
> > slot for various
> > WGs and Committees. Constituencies could meet on Monday or
> > even Tuesday
> > morning.
> > hope the current General Assembly Chair to coordinate the
> > meeting schedule as
> > well as the General Assembly agenda with DNSO Secretariat
> > preferrably 4
> > weeks in advance. hope Names Council to discuss on this
> > matter at the next
> > teleconferencing, too.
> > chon