[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] nominations
Joe and everyone else,
I don't see a "Richard" either. Is this Randy guy a nut or
something? Sure seems like it!
In a message dated 99-09-19 22:52:47 EDT, you write:
<< Subj: Re: [ga] nominations
Date: 99-09-19 22:52:47 EDT
From: email@example.com (J. Baptista)
To: firstname.lastname@example.org (Randy Bush)
CC: email@example.com (Sr. Francisco Fanego), firstname.lastname@example.org
Randy, it's Joe and Frank here. I don't see Richard, do you see Richard?
In any event, it's you maybe happy with icann's finances, I'm not. I want
to know why it's costing us 5 million to run a rinky dink operation which
only requires 600,000/yr. So if your happy with an operating increase of
830% may I suggest you stay out of financial discussions. I don't think
your qualified here, the art department is done the hall, engineering in
Sorry Randy, but this is a critical issue. 5 million today, 500 million
tommorrow, that is the nature of governing bodies.
On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Is ICANN accountable to me and the internet community - or is it
> > accountable to the doc? If it's accountable to me and the internet
> > community, I want to see that accountability in the form of a financial
> > statement.
> > If ICANN is accountable and run by the DOC, then I have a right to access
> > that information via an FOI request. It damed if you do and damed if you
> > don't either way.
> talking to yourself again, richard? and you still don't make much sense.
> i already know more than i care about icann's finances. the issue to me is
> getting enough sane folk on the board to plan and budget sensibly. and
> standing around bitching and moaning does not strike me as a productive way
> to do so. in fact, it seems the opposite, to be distraction action. but
> this is not new for you, is it.
David "Dude" Jenson