[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] the DNSO website
Wednesday, September 08, 1999, 11:16:14 PM, Kent Crispin <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 10:59:00PM -0700, William X. Walsh wrote:
>>> Dear Joop,
>>> you are not exactly correct :-)
>>> The Board has _not_ ignored the resolution of the GA.
>>> The resolution was that the board should _concider_ your application again,
>>> which was done. I was present , as you where.
>> No, you are not correct, and Joop is.
>> The board voted to delay consideration (for the second time) till the
>> next meeting.
> Correction. They considered it enough to delay further consideration
> until the next meeting. You admit they voted on it -- that
> constitutes consideration at a fairly significant level.
If you can't see that voting to NOT consider something is equal to
practically ignoring it, may I suggest a course in rational and
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Fax:(209) 671-7934
Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/
Join DNSPolicy.com's discussion list!
<IDNO MEMBER) http://www.idno.org