[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ga] NC violations of ICANN charters
Antony Van Couvering wrote:
> Kent Crispin wrote,
> +One could amend the bylaws to state that the GA shall elect 3 NC
> I think this is an excellent idea. I would favor it even
> more if it were
> reserved to those who had joined no other constituency.
May I disagree with you.
I prefer to have a constituency for Individual DN Holders, and let the GA
what it is, a forum for ideas with no restriction.
The difference may be subtle, but important: the moment you set up a voting
system (like the one that will choose the reps to the NC, you need to get
into the whole mess of certification of identity, as for a membership. This
will not be appropriate for the GA, but perfectly reasonable for a
Constituency, that will have to set up its own rules for membership (and
I confess I still don't understand why we are trying to find complicated
ways to address a simple problem like participation of individuals to the
NC, when the creation of a specific constituency may solve all the problems.