[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ga] Without sarcasm, this itme /was soemthing else)
Andy Gardner wrote:
> Considering you appear to hold quite a important position in the operation
> of ICANN,
Well, I am representing the Registrars constituency within the pNC. I tend to
read all ICANN-related mails. AAnd some times I tend to answer some threads.
Some people tend to listen to my views, andmany out there find themselves
systematically disagreeing with my statemnets. Some people seem to hate me,
while I have no official fan Club....
As fr as I know, I have no responsbility in operating ICANN.
your sarcastic, patronising and often demeaning comments towards
> those who happen to not agree with your viewpoint are not appreciated. In
> these circumstances I, quite frankly, find your attitude abhorrent.
Wait a minute. Sarcastic, yes sometimes. Patronising, I don't really think so.
Demeaning, well, it might happen. But not towards those who disagree with me.
In fact Alejandro was not disagreeing with me, or instance. He stated a fact
(more than an opinion) and I explained why this was not completly accurate in
my view. We have engaged no discussions about any "viewpoint" reagrding the
merits of WG A work or the `NC actions.
> I request that you treat those of us who are simply trying to ensure that
> the ICANN structure is quickly evolved to that which was originally
> envisaged, with the respect that we deserve.
We are all trying to do so, and I don't remember that I have ever treatd you
with any lack of respect whatsoever....
> I am sad that you consider opposing viewpoints as "list noise" that needs
> to be reduced. Unfortunatly, this appears to be the "norm" with those who
> have managed to gain control of ICANN and its functions.
The only reference to list noise I made was referred to my own postings.
Amadeu, breaking again his self-imposed noise reduction measure ;-)))