[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ga] Agenda proposal
Yes, I agree for the item 0:
Opening and DNSO organization", where the (interim) Chair presents how DNSO
is organized (secretariat, lists, web-sites, WGs etc.)
I think all items are not only for information, as it's bottom up process
the DNSO NC *must* take into account all remarks and suggestions the pubic
For the time on each point I will think about it, but I don't know if we
have a half day or a entire day. So If somebody could tell us how long will
be the GA?
E.T.S.I. FAS Systems Project Manager
Tel: +(33) (0)4 92 94 43 15
Fax: +(33) (0)4 92 38 52 15
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alf Hansen [mailto:Alf.Hansen@uninett.no]
> Sent: Monday, July 26, 1999 11:04
> To: Jean-Michel Becar; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [ga] Agenda proposal
> Jaen-Michel et al,
> Jean-Michel Becar wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > As I can see the discussion is not really constructive at
> that time. So
> > let's try to make things happen instead of trying to go
> back to the old
> > situation, Do you remember? So now let's go to work.
> Good! Let us move forward.
> > This is my proposal for the agenda of the DNSO GA in Santiago :
> Should there be an agenda item 0: "Opening and DNSO
> organization", where
> the (interim) Chair presents how DNSO is organized
> (secretariat, lists,
> web-sites, WGs etc.)?
> I think this could be useful not only for newcommers.
> > 1- Constituencies updates
> > A) each constituencies could make a 10 minutes speech
> > B) Public comments on constituencies
> > 2- Chairman's Working Groups updates
> > A) DG F
> > B) WG A
> > C) WG B
> > D) WG C
> > E) WG D
> > F) WG E
> > G) Public comments on working groups
> Will the result of item 1 an 2 be purely informational and feedback to
> the WG chairs? Will the DNSO-GA be able to decide anything in this
> > 3- Elections of the NC
> > When could be done? and how?
> > On that point I think that if the GA decide if we can go
> for the elections
> > at least for the recognized constituencies : ccTLD,
> Commercial and
> > Business entities, Registrars, Intellectual Property, ISP,
> they can process
> > during the Santiago and thus start to have a partial
> elected NC, which I
> > think it's better than a provisional NC.
> > The gTLD and the non Commercial must try to make their best
> effort to come
> > up with a solution to be recognized during this meeting.
> The gTLD must
> > accept the fact to have only one representative and the non
> Comm must find a
> > way to exist.
> > 4- Non commercial constituencie update
> > 5- Plan for the next months and future
> > According to John C. Lewis inputs:
> > A) DNSO Funding
> > B) Business plan & Financial report
> > C) Reltaionship of DNSO finances to the ICANN Board and operations
> > D) Actions to be taken for the next months
> > -- Nomination for the Borad : but we must wait for
> all constituencies
> > NC representative.
> > E) Preparation of the LA meeting
> > 6- Public general comments
> > 7- Buffet or drink ---- Very important item
> In order to make sure that all the agenda items will be
> handled, I think
> it could be useful to indicate how much time will be spent on
> each item.
> It is then the chairman's privilege to round off the agenda item when
> the time limit has been reached.
> > Jean-Michel Bécar
> > firstname.lastname@example.org
> > http://www.etsi.org
> > E.T.S.I. Project Manager
> > Tel: +(33) (0)4 92 94 43 15
> > Fax: +(33) (0)4 92 38 52 15
> Best regards,
> Alf Hansen Mail address: UNINETT FAS
> N-7465 Trondheim,
> Representing ccTLD .no
> Visiting Address: Tempeveien 22, 4th
> Direct phone: +47 73 55 79 21 Trondheim, Norway
> Mobile: +47 91 64 13 27
> Fax: +47 73 55 79 01
> Switch board: +47 73 55 79 00 E-mail: Alf.Hansen@uninett.no