Re: [ga] Re: Even Handed Application of The Rules (Yes or No? - Weshall see) (was Re: [ga] Posting rights of Jeff Williams susp
On 20 May 2003 at 11:22, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> >That is a choice that everyone has to make. I don't know of any list that
> > is so pure as to not have off-topic posts or personally objectionable
> >posts. Unsubscribing because one does not chooose to use filters, which
> >every mail client has available, is childish.
> > It results only in
> >silencing one's own voice rather than those who are subscribed and have
> >posting privileges. It's a rather self-defeating move, wouldn't you say?
> Of course it would be, it that was the situation.
> For who does not know/remember the history, when the monitoring was started
> there have been two lists, one monitored one unmonitored, both archived,
> and people had the freedom to choose either. Questions about freedom of
> speech are therefore rather pretestuous.
Now, however, the ga-full list is closed. Therefore silencing a poster in any form,
does just that. There is no alternative to the moderated list.
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html