RE: [ga] 6000+ unique At Large Members?
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
> the elections list can't be used -- ICANN always took the position that
> privacy rules prohibited contacting those people by or for the GA...
However section 6330 of the California corporations code - ICANN *is* a
California corporation - requires that "members" have the right to
"Inspect and copy the record of all the members' names, addresses and
The only question is whether ICANN's assertion that it has no members is
anything more than a self serving statement that does nothing to diminish
the statutory definition of a "member". I believe that ICANN has not
avoided the statutory definition.
See my note on all of this at
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html