Re: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions
- To: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "Nancy J. Victory" <email@example.com>, cathy Handley <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Don Evans <DEvans@doc.gov>, Robin Layton <RLayton@ntia.doc.gov>, Clyde Ensslin <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions
- From: Jeff Williams <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 18:37:42 -0800
- CC: DPF <email@example.com>, Vittorio Bertola <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "Sabine van-almsick (E-mail)" <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
- Organization: INEGroup Spokesman
- References: <0F25F91B59355E42846E57527F331EA9C47454@lganj0se6.lga.att.com>
- Sender: email@example.com
Marilyn and all former DNSO GA members,
The information you seek has already been discussed, debated, or otherwise
provided on a number of occasions on this forum. Perhaps a review of the
archives would be a good start for you to begin, Marilyn.
But to help you out a little bit for .FR see: http://www.nic.fr/english/tools/
and http://annuaire.nic.fr as well as http://www.nic.fr/cgi-bin/whois
also for some documentation regulation see: http://www.nic.fr/english/internal-regulations.html
For .DE see the following links to help you get started:
http://www.denic.de/index.en.html and for personal data
information see: http://www.denic.de/doc/personendaten.en.html
However this link seems to be contrary to the documentation
listed at: http://www.denic.de/doc/rfc/index.en.html
which references: http://www.denic.de/doc/rfc/domain/rfc2541.en.html
For some information on .UK see: http://www.nic.uk/rules/new-rules.html
and Whois see: http://www.nic.uk/whois.html . It may also be
a good idea to review http://www.nic.uk/news/guides/reg5.html
as well... Dispute resolution is for .UK info is here:
http://www.nic.uk/drs/mediation.html also see:
Case law on disputes for .UK is here: http://www.nic.uk/news/legal/index.html
However this seems to be a bit out of date... So again search the
DNSO GA forum archives as well as NYTIMES news archives
and perhaps the BBC news archives would bare some fruit as well...
For .AU perhaps Dave would be a better resource. However
I am sure that you yourself Marilyn can whip the web your self
for further info... After all you are a Whois Task force member,
so get to work and show us your great abilities on your own
Well Marilyn that should get you started and keep you busy for
Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
> David, you are a great resource to help us find out more about what ccTLDs do... in this area. Do you know what Domainz does? Is there a way to find out what some of the larger ccTLDs do? Such as .de; .uk; .au; .fr; etc.? Perhaps there is learning which the gTLDs can take from the ccTLDs. Many ccTLDs have regisrtrations from other countries so have the postal delivery issues as well.
> I'd be happy to post any relevant and factual responses we might be able to get to the WHOIS TF list.
> Regards, Marilyn Cade
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DPF [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 2:47 PM
> To: Vittorio Bertola
> Cc: email@example.com; Cade,Marilyn S - LGA;
> DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org; firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [ga] WHOIS accuracy, and name deletions
> On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 12:15:40 +0100, Vittorio Bertola
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >On Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:19:59 +1300, you wrote:
> >>If the registrant is a legitimate user, then once their domain stops
> >>working they will eventually contact the registrar to get it fixed.
> >The problem is that it might be too late - you might already be losing
> >valuable e-mail messages or website traffic. So even before putting
> >the domain on hold all efforts have to be made to contact the
> >registrant and fix the problem (and let alone the fact that one has
> >the right not to expose his/her identity to the whole world).
> The issue of should you be allowed to be anonymous is a slightly
> different debate. For now the policy is you need correct data and the
> issue is how to mitigate potential loss of a domain and purchase by
> someone else (which is far worse).
> I agree putting on hold is not without consequences and there should
> be a minimum of three attempts to contact the registrant.
> E-mail: email@example.com
> ICQ: 29964527
> MSN: firstname.lastname@example.org
> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 129k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html