Re: [ga] Re: Names Council Resolution on Reform
> > The point is that ICANN has no right to insist that there be only one
> The protocols require that there be only one root:
Which begs the question of what one means by "root". There should be a
consistent namespace. But the question of "authority" for obtaining a
consistent namespace is not a technical issue.
The NIST, for example, defines what is a "liter" in the United States.
Enforcement of weights and measures statutes is in the hands of 50 separate
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html