Re: [ga] Registrars and ICANN Budget Approval

[DannyYounger@cs.com]

Ross,

Thanks for the clarification.  

I note that the RAA stipulates that "any such fees must be expressly approved 
by registrars accounting, in the aggregate, for payment of two-thirds of all 
registrar-level fees".  Just speaking on a hypothetical basis, if one 
dominant registrar decided to withhold such express approval, wouldn't such 
action effectively cripple the budgetary process?  This particular language, 
as written, strikes me as "bad policy".   Wouldn't it be more prudent to 
request approval by two-thirds of all accredited registrars instead?  A 
single party should not have the power to jeopardize the overall budget, 
should they?  

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html