Re: [ga] WLS call follow-up

[Gary Osbourne <gro@direct.ca>]

At 12:39 PM 22/05/02 -0400, Dan Steinberg wrote:

>I fail to see how you draw those conclusions from my post.
>I'm pretty sure that I was quite explicit in commenting on
>the the market share claims. nothing more.

I am drawing the conclusion that Veri$ign's claim that
they have [x] support is irrelevant, regardless of [x].
If they had brought forward the WLS prior to their having
any competition, they could have argued that they had
100% support, which would have been accurate, and equally
meaningless. I don't why you seem to be even considering,
let alone accepting, the market share argument. -g

>Gary Osbourne wrote:
> >
> > At 08:40 AM 22/05/02 -0400, Dan Steinberg wrote:
> > >Interesting numbers.  But given that you figure the remains add up to
> > >maybe 10% and the original claim worked out to 17.5% we are not talking
> > >much of a difference. 10% -17/5% is not a big spread. The large numbers
> > >are still the 40% which belongs to the Verisign registrar.  No matter
> > >how it's sliced, Verisign  Registry can technically claim market share
> > >support in the registrar business for their WLS proposal.
> >
> > So, *because* ICANN has to date largely failed at
> > fostering competition for Veri$ign, that is given
> > as a rationale for why ICANN should OK a proposal
> > that further lessens competition for Veri$ign? -g
>
>--
>Dan Steinberg
>
>SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
>35, du Ravin            phone: (613) 794-5356
>Chelsea, Quebec         fax:   (819) 827-4398
>J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html