RE: [ga] Abusing consensus in the Transfers TF

[Joanna Lane <jo-uk@rcn.com>]

Thursday, Thursday, March 28, 2002, 6:16:26 AM, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:

> It is a murky issue, but I fail to see the relevance. The clause in
question
> states:

> "Instances when the requested change of sponsoring Registrar may be denied
> include, but are not limited to:
> ...
> 2) A pending bankruptcy of the Registered Name holder
> ..."

> If the losing registrar has been identified as a creditor in a company
that
> is in the process of declaring bankruptcy, the losing registrar has a
> legitimate vested interest in ensuring that it's "soon-to-be-asset" isn't
> transferred out to another registrar until such time that the actual
> structure of the bankruptcy is declared and the asset details can be
sorted
> out by the relevent agencies.

Perhaps then the section should be edited to read:

2) A pending bankruptcy of the Registered Name holder where the
Registrar is or may become a creditor.



--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Save Internet Radio!
CARP will kill Webcasting!
http://www.saveinternetradio.org/

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html