DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] ICANN: already two consensuses: still three more needed

[individual cc's removed.  If they are reading the groups they don't need
the cc's; if they are not reading the groups we don't need them.]

Please remain open to the idea that many of the functions currently under
the ICANN/IANA rubrics should be split off and handed to other groups,
either new or existing.  Too many different functions under one roof
requires too great a combination of skill sets, and also creates a real
monster if it gets out of control.

On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Jefsey Morfin wrote:

> - a clean sheet, step by step approach. We know everyone's agenda and 
> feuds, no need to repeat. What we want is to find solutions which satisfy 
> *every* of us. If we fail, there will be no ICANN anymore as "we are the 
> ICANN" as Mike Roberts truly said.

		Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
                        -->It's warm here.<--

This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>