RE: [ga] Icannatlarge.com - conflict of interest
Are you in charge of the Icannatlarge? As a member, I object to your
attempt at rule making.
As others have stated, if the will of the membership elect someone then
its the will of the members -- there should be no artificial barriers.
Your directive, quoted below, is fashioned out of the same greed for power
as other ICANN affiliates have expressed. If you desire to retain an
ounce of democratic intentions I suggest you withdraw you direction to
On Sat, 2 Mar 2002, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> At 15:23 28/02/02 -0500, Joanna Lane wrote:
> >I am mindful to avoid unecessary procedural clutter, so let's to cut to the
> >chase. It is my suggestion to agree one ground rule. While the DNSO
> >continues to operate as currently structured, no officers of the DNSO shall
> >be eligible to stand for office in the At Large.
> Please post a usable clause to that effect under the Charter thread in the
> It will be one of the many building blocks.
> This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
> Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html