DNSO Mailling lists archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Structure Taskforce Update No 3

yOn Thu, 17 Jan 2002, David Farrar wrote:

> Draft No 4 is now at http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-str/Arc00/doc00010.doc
> Draft 3 proposed a minimum 30,000 people have to join the ALSO befoe it could
> elect Board members etc.  In post http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-
> str/Arc00/msg00073.html I suggested 1,000 or so would be a more appropriate
> level.

I would suggest that the minimum level be however many people vote.
All of these "minimum participation levels" are a distraction perpetrated
by entrenched interests with the aim of preventing representation.

Apologies to those that might view this as American-centric(insert your
country of origin if it makes you feel better) but does the U.S. decide
that it can't elect officials unless a set number of individuals or
percentage of the populace vote?

Of course not, that would be stupid.

                               Patrick Greenwell
                     Stealthgeeks,LLC. Operations Consulting

This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>