ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Business Constituency


Patrick:

You are mixing apples with oranges.  There is no relationship
between internal processes happening inside a constituency with
the issue if GA has voice or not in the decision making process of
ICANN.

Of course freedom of speech exists and anyone can make their opinions
about what is happening internally in the BC if you want, but you cannot
force members of the BC to report internal issues not related with
policy making to the GA or even to the NC, until they arrives to the
part of the process when they have to make any futher consultations, if
any has to be done.

Internal issues, are internal issues, period.

Best Regards
Vany


Patrick Corliss wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2001 11:23:23 +0100, Philip Sheppard wrote:
> 
> > The Business Constituency has launched an internal
> > debate to revise its charter. To give due respect to the
> > participation of BC members in this debate, the
> > Constituency will not be replying to discussion on
> > this matter outside of the Constituency at this point.
> 
> Hi Philip
> 
> Are you confirming that the General Assembly has no
> voice in the decision making process of ICANN?
> 
> Regards
> Patrick Corliss
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

-- 
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Tel: (507) 317-0169
http://www.sdnp.org.pa
e-mail:  vany@sdnp.org.pa
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>