[ga] Re: Roeland's Motion

[DannyYounger@cs.com]

I have re-worded Roeland's motion to better reflect what may be an emerging 
GA consensus view.  Your comments are needed.


Whereas the Domain Name Supporting Organization Formation Concepts (adopted 
by the ICANN Board March 4, 1999), state that "The ICANN Board should 
periodically review the status of the constituency groups to determine 
whether all DNSO interests are adequately represented"

Whereas members of the General Assembly have repeatedly expressed their 
concern that the DNSO as currently constituted is not sufficiently 
representative

Whereas problems outlined by the DNSO Review have not been remedied 
internally, and efforts undertaken by the Names Council have failed to 
sufficiently address these concerns

It is therefore

RESOLVED that the ICANN Board be advised that:

1.  Members of the General Assembly believe that DNSO dysfunctionality 
requires direct ICANN Board intervention

2.  The General Assembly seeks to establish a representative balance by being 
placed on equal footing with the current DNSO Names Council, creating a 
bicameral DNSO.

3.  The General Assembly seeks initial budgetary/Secretariat support for the 
DNSO/GA to perform its functions. 

4.  The General Assembly will work with ICANN to develop an appropriate 
funding model to support its activities.

5.  The General Assembly seeks representation on the ICANN Board (to be 
filled by a representitive voting the recorded consensus of the DNSO/GA)

6.  The General Assembly seeks to have both an Advocate and a Consensus 
Leader, both elected positions of the DNSO/GA with budgetary control and 
responsibility for all DNSO/GA staff.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html