Protection from what? - Re: [ga] Consumer/Registrant Protection Consitituency

[Derek Conant <dconant@dnsga.org>]

Where is there evidence that Consumer/Registrants need protection?  Protection
when?  Protection from what?  Protection from whom?  A consumer and registrant
can be both commercial and private.  This Consumer/Registrants issue appears to
be an At-Large constituency matter.  Is this group proposing a constituency just
to propose one?  Or, what?

In an earlier post, I requested information concerning Registrars engaged in
buying or selling expired domain names and other matters.  There are rumors that
Consumer/Registrants need protection, however, this concept appears to be
motivated only by speculation and paranoia that have no merit.

Derek Conant
DNSGA President and Chairman

erica wrote:

> Subject: RE: [ga] Consumer/Registrant Protection Consitituency
>
> >
> > > Or do you like to revisit my WG proposal to bring all
> > > Registrants together
> > > in one super-constituency?
> >
> > Since we're all in the same stew-pot ... why not?
>
> The best reason 'why not' is that, as far as I know, there is no support for
> this from either the business or non-commercial constituency.  The only way
> this could succeed, is with their support.
>
> erica
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html