ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] FYI: Bandwidth and Session Limits to be Deployed within the SRS


I am pleased to see them fairly balancing the load.  This does not surprise 
me at all.  I am and have been a supporter of NSI for a long time...

:)


At 04:42 PM 7/18/2001 +0200, Marc Schneiders wrote:
>The problem is not bandwidth of course. It is about monopolizing the
>registry database. The limit is to avoid that.
>
>On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, at 08:58 [=GMT-0700], Kristy McKee wrote:
>
> >
> > I don't think a registry could survive with such a small amount of
> > throughput to the source.  I would think that by now NSI would be running
> > with OC-12s or 48s and the smallest connection to them would be no less
> > than a DS-1 for each registrar.
> >
> > How sad...
> >
> >
> > At 10:37 AM 7/18/2001 +0200, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> > >On 16:21 17/07/01, Peter de Blanc said:
> > >>Does this mean that the VeriSign-NetSol link will also be limited to 250
> > >>connections and 256 K ?
> > >>Peter de Blanc
> > >
> > >Additional question: when the same group owns several accredited 
> Registrars.
> > >Is "crossbandwidthing" controlled?
> > >Jefsey
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org] On Behalf Of
> > >>Alexander Svensson
> > >>Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 5:25 AM
> > >>To: ga@dnso.org
> > >>Subject: [ga] FYI: Bandwidth and Session Limits to be Deployed within
> > >>the SRS
> > >>
> > >>"VeriSign Registry proposed that, as an interim measure, it would place
> > >>a uniform limit of 250 simultaneous connections and 256k bandwidth
> > >>applied to each accredited registrar."
> > >>
> > >>http://www.icann.org/announcements/icann-pr16jul01.htm
> > >>
> > >>ICANN Advisory
> > >>Equitable Allocation of Shared Registration System Resources
> > >>
> > >>(
> > >>
> > >>--
> > >>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > >>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > >>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > >>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > >--
> > >This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > >("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>