RE: [ga] President Younger's Independence Day Address to the Worl d

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>]

Bret,

Resources allocated for the benefit of the GA is a different issue than the
GA making decisions as to how resources contributed by others are used.
Input from the GA should be encouraged in the latter situation, but I'm not
sure that the GA should be given approval/disapproval rights.

I also think that an individuals constituency might resolve a lot of the
issues here.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Bret A. Fausett [mailto:baf@fausett.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Patrick Corliss'; Philip Sheppard
Cc: M. Stuart Lynn, ICANN; [ga]
Subject: Re: [ga] President Younger's Independence Day Address to the
Worl d


Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Let me see if I understand this.  The constituencies pay for the services,
> but the GA wants to call the shots?

The GA is _supposed to be_ an umbrella organization encompassing all the
constituencies, so the idea that resources could be allocated to it without
charging those who participate in it a separate fee isn't that hard to
accept. I hope the current problem of this being a de facto place for
unaffiliated DNSO participants will be cured when an individual domain name
owners constituency is finally chartered and operational.

      -- Bret
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html