[ga] Re: [ga-review] Proposal to Merge the Business and Intellectual Property Constituency
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: [ga] Re: [ga-review] Proposal to Merge the Business and Intellectual Property Constituency
- From: Jefsey Morfin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 02:24:21 +0200
- In-Reply-To: <email@example.com>
- References: <NDBBJHDDILJHEHGGGCCEIEAGCNAA.firstname.lastname@example.org><NDBBJHDDILJHEHGGGCCEIEAGCNAA.email@example.com>
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
it only shows the BC is not fulfilling its mission. Not that it has no mission.
As an SME and a sall TM owner I don't see my interests represented by
anyt of them two. You may rememebr that Philip Shepard publicly asked
me on this list broadcasting a mail he has sent me privafely. This makes
two responses: I did not have even an ACK.
My position is simple: BC and IP should at least be be populated by 50%
real people; true TM owners and true business owner/CEOs. Not by
lawyers and employees.
On 23:44 08/06/01, DPF said:
>On Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:41:49 -0400, you wrote:
> >The history of the DNSO is replete with joint communiqués issued by the
> >Business and Intellectual Property Constituency:
> >1. BC-IPC Safeguards Precis (Sept.2000)
> >2. Minimum safeguards for the introduction of new TLDs - a joint statement
> >from the Business and Intellectual Property Constituencies (Sept. 2000)
> >The Business Constituency website routinely posts remarks from the
> >Intellectual Property Constituency such as, "IP Constituency Statement on
> >Proposed ICANN/VeriSign Agreement".
> >It is clear to even the most casual observer that the affinity between these
> >two groups is such that we are essentially looking at two sides of the same
> >coin. A merger of these two constituencies would seem to be indicated.
>I must admit I can see almost no difference between them. I was
>surprised to see on the WIPO site a submission from one of the BC reps
>on the Names Council in his role as Chair of the European Trademark
>Association (or similar).
>This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
>Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga-review" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html