Re: [ga] Joop's motions

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 13:36 13/05/01 -0700, William S. Lovell wrote: 



> But first, since from Florida we know how
> voters can get confused, I would 
> strongly urge that the desired representation for individuals be given
> the term 
> "Individuals Constituency = IC."  If this group has too
> many "fumble fingers" 
> in it, as I can sometimes be, IDNH and IDNO will get confused, and people
> may be yelling "yeah, yeah" for one when they mean the other.

That is right and this is the reason why I have proposed calling it the
IC.



> But as to the substance, the incorrect premise
> is that to form an IC one goes 
> through some list of existing bodies that have advanced themselves as
> candidates.

That would indeed be a false premise. However, I do not advocate it.
If the IDNO has to die in order for an IC (with a universally approved
structure---tiny problem: how are you going to get that) to take it's
place, that is fine with me.

--Joop Teernstra LL.M.-- 

the Cyberspace Association and

the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners

Elected representative.

http://www.idno.org