Re: [ga] ICANN's Letter to the IRS

[Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>]

On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:17:59PM -0400, babybows.com wrote:
> As long as ICANN has represented that SOs are, in effect, internal ICANN
> working committees, then these committees should be fully funded by their
> parent body, especially if the parent body is a non-profit public benefit
> corporation.

Sorry, that doesn't follow at all.  It is perfectly reasonable that an 
internal committee of a nppbc should fund its own activities.

> To have these bodies operate on the basis of funds received
> only from "special interest groups" is antithetical to the premise of public
> benefit.

Nonsense.  The issues are completely orthogonal.

-- 
Kent Crispin                               "Be good, and you will be
kent@songbird.com                           lonesome." -- Mark Twain
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html