ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] collisions in namespace (was gTLD Constituency)


The point that is missed in analyses, such as the one below, is that those 
in other roots chose to establish those roots (namespaces) independently of 
IANA/ICANN.  It therefore makes no sense at all to now expect IANA/ICANN to 
"coordinate" with those independent activities.

People who choose to work independently should be allowed and encouraged to 
operate in the mode they chose:  independent.

d/

At 12:37 PM 4/11/2001, JandL wrote:
>This will be my last post in this thread, as it seems to be going
>nowhere.
>
>It appears that the basic argument is the same one that ICANN
>uses.  They are responsible for only "their root" and all others can
>do as they please.  The fallacy here is due to the fact that there is
>a singular name space which makes the technical argument one of
>fragmentation of that name space.  Once ICANN divides it with a
>collider, it is a done deal.

----------
Dave Crocker   <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking   <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253;   fax: +1.408.273.6464

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>