RE: [ga] gTLD Constituency
> From: Christopher Ambler [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 12:01 PM
> > ignored my observation that my position on where to draw
> the membership
> > line is not consistent with what you would expect to be my client's
> > preference. Oops.
> No oops. I didn't choose to point out the obvious. I guess
> you're asking
> me to. Your client has a vested interest in ensuring the
> stability of ICANN
> and that there are no threats to that stability. Hence your
> tactics of diversion
> and avoiding issues that are troublesome to ICANN. Your client has
> a vested interest in preventing new competition, hence your
> position of
> not allowing applicants in the constituency.
> I would have thought this obvious.
I don't track something here. I thought that his client is/was in the same
boat with you.
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html