[ga] serious participation in ICANN processes
At 08:14 AM 4/2/2001, Kent Crispin wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:37:52AM -0400, Sandy Harris wrote:
> >Here, though, the negotiated deal violates policy by scrapping the
> >of registry and registrar.
>1) There is no such policy.
> >I do not think board and staff have the authority
> >to do that without DNSO approval.
>In fact, the board has the legal, moral, and and ethical DUTY to act
>without DNSO approval, if they find it is in the best interests of the
>Internet. This is clearly spelled out in the Bylaws.
These two items demonstrate the pervasive tendency to debate about
theoretical issues that have no factual basis in ICANN legal documents.
As people claim to be serious participants, they should consider the
responsibility that participation carries, to be adequately educated about
the relevant fact, not theory.
Dave Crocker <mailto:email@example.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253; fax: +1.408.273.6464
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html