ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Last minute changes to Verisign agreements


At 05:51 AM 4/2/2001, Paul Svensson wrote:
>The issue isn't if option C is an improvement on option B (which it
>apparently seems to be), but whether it's an improvement on option A.

I agree entirely.

>Which means, that even if it's obvious that it's a step in the right
>direction, it may take more than 24 hours to analyze wether it goes
>far enough.

Let me save you some effort:  The newest revisions do NOT go far enough.

So is that a reason to reject all of its improvements and, instead, to 
choose the very much inferior existing contract?

d/

----------
Dave Crocker   <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking   <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel: +1.408.246.8253;   fax: +1.408.273.6464

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>