Re: Re[2]: [ga] let's focus on making sure that, in the various forums, we can as k substantive questions

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler-dompol@iodesign.com>]

I didn't mean the IAHC as an entity, I meant not since the approximate timeframe
that the IAHC was created.

In other words, the answer, since around 1997, is a resounding "no."

Nothing has been "grandfathered" unless the self-appointed board at the time
has wanted it so. Certainly not by consensus, and certainly not the "Internet Way."

If it wasn't sarcasm, then it was rose-coloured.

Christopher

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>
To: "'Christopher Ambler'" <cambler-dompol@iodesign.com>; <ga@dnso.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 8:37 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [ga] let's focus on making sure that, in the various forums, we can as k substantive questions


> Chris, the IAHC was hardly broadly consultative. So, no, it wasn't sarcasm.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Ambler [mailto:cambler-dompol@iodesign.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 11:07 PM
> To: ga@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [ga] let's focus on making sure that, in the various
> forums, we can as k substantive questions
> 
> 
> From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>
> > I seem to recall the there is such a thing as "grandfather" those that are
> > in place, freeze for any new, and then start anew, as of a date certain.
> > Gee, isn't that a time honored Internet behavior?
> 
> Not since the IAHC. That's sarcasm, right?
> 
> Christopher
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html