Re: [ga] Call for focus.....
At 06:52 PM 2/14/01, Sotiropoulos wrote:
>Greg Burton wrote:
> > At 04:51 PM 2/14/01, Sotiropoulos wrote:
> > >I don't believe I said anything about "dropping" the DNSO issues
> > >Greg. I'd like
> > >for you to point out that explicit statement, if you may.
> > On 01:40 PM 2/10/01, Sotiropoulos said:
> > >How about we altogether focus on the @Large instead?
> > Seems pretty clear to me......note that you did say "instead"
>For someone who is quick to point out *Rhetorical Devices*, you should be
>equally good at recognizing rhetorical questions. Why didn't you quote the
>entire paragraph? I think you're going to have to do substantially better
> Try to focus on substance related to the GA, please - IDNO garbage by
> definition isn't it.
And the entire paragraph of your response to that was:
> How about we altogether focus on the @Large instead? Divert all this
> and goodwill, and focus it on the @Large? After all, it's not like the
> paying us to do their work for them... or are they paying, but just not
all of us?
Rhetorical question.....sure thing.
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html