Re: [ga] UDRP review
>I was under the distinct impression that due to litigation it was decided
>that any self
>critiqueing of the UDRP would create liability and therefore it was cancelled.
>That was just an impression of a Hearsay article I can't even identify.
So how on earth can we get it changed, then?
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.domain-owners.org http://www.tldlobby.com
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html