Re: Re: [ga] status of the GA
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, at 10:02 [=GMT-0800], William X. Walsh wrote:
> Tuesday, January 30, 2001, 9:57:16 AM, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, at 08:54 [=GMT-0800], William X. Walsh wrote:
> >> Tuesday, January 30, 2001, 7:19:05 AM, Mikael Pawlo wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> >> > (---)
> >> >> What would you conclude if not that there is not a great interest in the
> >> >> matter?
> >> > Don't underestimate the Jeff Williams-factor. I think a lot of interested
> >> > parties - like yours truly - got tired of the konstant rants and raves and
> >> > ramblings on the GA mailinglist. The most important assignment for a new
> >> > GA chair should - in my humble opinion - be to set the GA straight again
> >> > and make it free from so called "trolls".
> >> They got rid of Baptista, and they got rid of all but one of the
> >> sundry personalities of Jeff Williams.
> >> What more do you want?
> > This is too sarcastic, William.
> I think the blaming of "the Jeff Williams-factor" for lack of DNSO
> participation is a very faulty statement to make, Marc. [...]
Sorry, I did not make myself at all clear. _I_ was trying to be
sarcastic perhaps. I tried to intimate that some people might reply to
your question "What more do you want?": that _you_ go away. Many
people are put off by very long threads involving just 2 or 3
people. I mean no harm. We may both take this matter to heart and
restrain ourselves in posting again and again.
/"\ / http://www.bijt.net/
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN /
X AGAINST HTML MAIL /
/ \ AND POSTINGS / http://mydomainline.com/
This message was passed to you via the email@example.com list.
Send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html