Re: [ga] Harald's comment discussed on the EU list

[James Love <love@cptech.org>]

On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> >The constituency model requires that the organization have some 
> >representational relevance for the constituency it claims to 
> >represent.  IDNO does not satisfy this basic requirement.
> >
> 
> The IDNO satisfies it  just as well, or better , as the present
> constituencies of the DNSO, with the possible exception of the IP
> constituency.  

   I'm not well versed on the details on this, but isn't the main thing
to get the DNSO and ICANN to agree that the DNSO must same *some*
constituency that gives individual DN a voice?  Or is this more about
the IDNO application?  Jamie


-------------
James Love  mailto:love@cptech.org http://www.cptech.org
Consumer Project on Technology, Voice 1.202.387.8030  Fax 1.202.234.5176     


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html