ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: Re[3]: [ga] FW: UPDATE: ICANN-Yokohama Remote Participation Details




from http://www.gtld-mou.org/gtld-discuss/mail-archive/00990.html

        While there is much discussion of a process for establishing
        new registries and new top level domains taking place, no
        conclusions have been reached as yet.

        Request sent to the IANA for a new top level domain will be
        filed with the many other requests.  There is some considerable
        possibility that this particular request will not be granted
        (in simple words -- don't plan on it).

did you guys not read the replies Jon sent you, its quoted on the very
page you refer to.

just what part of the above did you not understand?

-rick


On Sun, 9 Jul 2000, Christopher Ambler wrote:

> > You can apply for ownership of a tollbridge in New York, that doesn't
> > make your application have any basis in reality.  
> 
> When the New York Tollbridge Authority asks for such applications
> and then publishes the list of same, it does make the applications have
> a basis in reality. 
> 
> > Much like your self
> > claimed TLDs (of which nearly all do not have, and have never had,
> > live registries, so they are nothing more than undeveloped self
> > claimed TLDs without any real authority or sanction).
> 
> Image Online Design has had a live registry since its application. Do
> you then consider us a special case?
> 
> Christopher
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>