Gentlemen, Kathy, Milt,
Please give some details of what you have been up to,
while I was out. I understand you are searching a positive attribution
of identity for an email that was sent, but repudiated by, Jeff Williams.
There has been a private correspondence with Mr Baptista and Mr Williams
on the subject.
What reasons are there for believing the parties concerned
are telling the truth or lying? I offer the following hypothetical notes
which might be useful::
(i) Place: Wrong location
(ii) Identity: Multiple accusations , no basis of attribution
(iii) Motive: Not in my interest
(iv) Motive: Group psychological motivation
v) Result: Potentially Productive Outcome
It looks like someone has set up something to test Harald's
new rules, using my, Jeff's and other identities. This is not necessarily
a bad thing. I think we should have been asked perhaps. Where is the Serjeant-at-Arms
to provide the appropriate jurisprudence? Mr Baptista and Mr Williams have
already made intelligent private comments concerning this. I suggest that
Harald be allowed to get on with it.
Kind regards,
MM
_____________________________________________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
The contents of this e-mail are confidential to the ordinary
user of
the e-mail address to which it was addressed and may
also be
privileged. If you are not the addressee of this
e-mail you may not
copy, forward, disclose or otherwise use it or any part
of it in any
form whatsoever. If you have received this e-mail
in error please
e-mail the sender by replying to this message.
______________________________________________________________________
"!Dr. Joe Baptista" wrote:
Hello:
This is a public matter - therefore a public response
is in order.
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Milton Mueller wrote:
> Thanks. I always knew Measday was a fraud, but not this
type of a fraud.
> --MM
I don't know if he's a fraud, he certainly knows how to
commit
fraud. That's a given. I think you should
just approach Mark and ask him
to appologize in public. That should serve to reduce
criminal liability
in this matter.
I think I probably gave Mark the idea to forge the message.
I used this
method to bypass the censorship in the GA - and very
successfully I might
add. The only difference is in my case I did not
commit wire fraud. All
forged messages were properly identified as my own so
as to ensure I did
not commit fraud by impersonation.
What Mark did is not the end of the world. It was
probably just a knee
jerk reaction which was inappropriate at best.
Regards
Joe Baptista
>
> !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
>
> > Domain name:
> > josmarian.ch
> >
> > Holder of domain name:
> > Josmarian
> > Mark Richard Measday
> > rue Daubin 32
> > CH-1203 Genhve
> > Switzerland
> >
> > Technical contact:
> > PSINet Switzerland SA
> > DNS Technical Team
> > rte de Pri-Bois 20
> > CH-1215 Genhve
> > Switzerland
> >
> > Name servers:
> > ns1.iprolink.ch [194.41.63.1]
> > ns2.iprolink.ch [194.41.63.19]
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
> >
>
>
>
Regards,