[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] Re: [ga-full] Individuals
At 03:04 AM 5/28/00 +1000, Patrick Corliss wrote:
Just put Dave Crocker in your /dev/null file and save yourself the grief.
>Could you PLEASE contribute something meaningful?
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Dave Crocker <email@example.com>
>To: Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Cc: Roberto Gaetano <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2000 12:40 AM
>Subject: Re: [ga] Re: [ga-full] Individuals
> > At 10:24 AM 5/27/00 -0400, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law wrote:
> > >On Sat, 27 May 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> > > > Should there be a difference in Individual Domain Name Holders and
> > > > Users of the Net?
> > >
> > >Their interests are similar but not identical. I'd like to hear more on
> > >this subject.
> > In what way do their interests differ?
> > > > What is the relationship possible between the Individuals active in
> > > > DNSO and the ICANN AtLarge Membership?
> > > >
> > >
> > >Individuals probably require their own constituency in the DNSO.
> > >one for each region? ;>
> > This statement suggests goes down the path that leads to claiming that
> > there is a constituency for every label, category or type that can be
> > imagined. While the academic exercise of looking for discernible labels
> > might be interesting, it is not a useful way to find and create meaningful
> > constituency categories. The practise should be to first understand what
> > differences motivate a category.
> > > > Should this issue be discussed further, and brought to Yokohama (or
> > > > anyhow to ICANN's attention)?
> > >
> > >It's clear that ICANN will not act on what it doesn't want to see. The
> > So now you profess to know the nature and practise of the combines psyches
> > of ICANN board members? That's going just a bit far, don't you think?
> > >IDNO proposal, for all its faults, never got formally considered. David
> > There was nothing to consider. It was a group entirely without relevant
> > content.
> > d/
> > =-=-=-=-=
> > Dave Crocker <email@example.com>
> > Brandenburg Consulting <www.brandenburg.com>
> > Tel: +1.408.246.8253, Fax: +1.408.273.6464
> > 675 Spruce Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
> > Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
>Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
It's a feature not a bug...
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html