[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKI
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000 at 08:07:01PM -0800, William X. Walsh wrote:
> On 08-Mar-2000 Kent Crispin wrote:
> > It would be fair to call Jon's paper a "Chair's Summary".
> Is there anything contained in the report that is substantively against the
> rough consensus reached on the list, Kent?
Like many people, I haven't had time to read it and think about it, much
less write up any comments. That is one of the problems.
> If not, then it is more than a "Chair's Summary" even if the document itself
> was not formally voted on.
That doesn't follow. Jon could have written nothing but "The WG
discussed things", and it still wouldn't be any more than a "Chair's
Summary", without the some kind of involvement or approval of the WG.
Kent Crispin "Do good, and you'll be
email@example.com lonesome." -- Mark Twain
This message was passed to you via the firstname.lastname@example.org list.
Send mail to email@example.com to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html